On 07/03/2012 13:34, Ryan Johnson wrote: > On 07/03/2012 8:07 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> On Mar 7 07:54, Ryan Johnson wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I tried to bootstrap the gcc-4.7 RC and it fails because it expects >>> to find<process.h> and the file actually lives in >>> <cygwin/process.h> (see >>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52513). >>> >>> I'm asking here because the gcc devs thought this would mean 4.6 is >>> broken as well, but I have 4.6.2 running. Did process.h perhaps move >>> between 1.7.10 and 1.7.11? I guess configure must be using linker >>> rather than preprocessor tests for presence of spawnve, because it >>> thinks (correctly) that the function exists. >> See http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2012-02/msg00041.html >> We moved it back. If you have it in cygwin/process.h, you didn't >> update from 1.7.10 to 1.7.11. > Ah, I do remember that, now that you mention, but I was running a 1.7.11 > snapshot and forgot to upgrade... > > Thanks for the quick reply, > Ryan
Thanks for spotting that Ryan. FTR, I figure it's not worth delaying the GCC release to add a fix to support .10, since there were other significant problems with it, and anyone who has it should be moving to .11 anyway. cheers, DaveK -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple