On 4/11/2012 9:48 PM, Gregory M. Turner wrote:
----- Original Message (cgf) -----
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 06:17:40PM -0000, Gregory M. Turner wrote:
----- Original Message (Me) -----


  $ diff -u<(echo foo)<(echo bar)
      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ concrete detail


I suspect that it probably about as irritable as certain people get when
"bug reports" are couched in colorful adjective-laden language without
any actual concrete details.

Eh?  There's been no bug report.  I was just sharing some casual
observations in response to another post.

To be clear:

The above diff command has no output.  The output is supposed to be along the 
lines of:

--- /dev/fd/63  2012-04-11 11:44:02.283689675 -0700
+++ /dev/fd/62  2012-04-11 11:44:02.283689675 -0700
@@ -1 +1 @@
-foo
+bar

The failure is reproducible on the latest mainline distribution running
on my workstation.  It also occurs exactly the same way in a very different
roll-your-own environment I have immediate access to, also on my workstation.

I suppose I could have mentioned that my box is:

CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW64 1.7.13(0.260/5/3) 2012-04-05 12:43 i686 unknown unknown 
Cygwin


solved on latest snapshot 20120411

$ diff -u <(echo bar) <(echo foo)
--- /dev/fd/63  2012-04-11 22:02:17.000000000 +0200
+++ /dev/fd/62  2012-04-11 22:02:17.000000000 +0200
@@ -1 +1 @@
-bar
+foo

marco@MARCOATZERI ~
$ uname -a
CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW64 MARCOATZERI 1.7.14s(0.260/5/3) 20120411 13:57:42 i686 Cygwin


Regards
Marco

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Reply via email to