On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 01:17:07AM +0200, Angelo Graziosi wrote: > Steve Kargl wrote > > > My > > disagreemnet is predicated on the stupidity of using a 10 line > > example subroutine without actually inspecting what it does on > > whatever OS that one chooses to use. > > It is just because one has tested that code that these problems came to > light... :-) >
When testing, it would help if the results were properly represented as your initial subject line was "Random seed initialization". It seems clear to at least me your testing did not include actually inspecting what these two lines do: CALL SYSTEM_CLOCK(COUNT=clock) seed = clock + 37 * (/ (i-1), 1=1, n) /) because your subject would have been "SYSTEM_CLOCK is broken on cygwin". If you want to see an actual issue with "Random seed initialization" go read PR 52879. -- Steve -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple