Op 24-4-2013 20:30, Corinna Vinschen schreef:
On Apr 24 20:25, Erwin Waterlander wrote:
Op 24-4-2013 15:47, Corinna Vinschen schreef:
On Apr 24 14:59, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Apr 23 23:56, Christian Franke wrote:
Possibly a __builtin_va_list related gcc bug.
This is rather unlikely. That code is shared between Cygwin and
Mingw, and chances are that the bug would have been found already.
What about a type issue? int vs. long?
For clearness I decided to add a quick lecture. Hope that's ok.
The Cygwin x86_64 toolchain is using the LP64(*) data model. That means,
in contrast to Windows, which uses an LLP64(*) data model, sizeof(long)
!= sizeof(int), just as on Linux.
For comparison:
Cygwin Windows Cygwin
Linux x86_64 Linux
Windows x86_64
i686
sizeof(int) 4 4 4
sizeof(long) 4 4 8
sizeof(size_t) 4 8 8
sizeof(void*) 4 8 8
And these. Interesting for people handling Unicode (wide) text:
sizeof(wchar_t) 2 2 2
sizeof(wint_t) 2 2 4
No, that's not correct:
sizeof(wint_t) 4 4 4
This is very important because of WEOF.
We are both incorrect. I tried and got these results.
sizeof(wint_t) will give:
Cygwin i686: 4
MinGW32 : 2
MinGW-w64: 2
Cygwin x86_64: 4
--
Erwin Waterlander
http://waterlan.home.xs4all.nl/
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple