On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:07:03AM +0400, Fedin Pavel wrote: >> Not to discourage you but there will be a fairly low tolerance for much >> of a complexity change or almost any performance degradation. Cygwin's >> performance is a regular source of complaints on this list (and >> elsewhere). > > By the way... Right now i'm testing 64-bit Cygwin, and it appears to be >significantly faster. I wonder, did you do anything special to achieve this >? Or does this mean just that 32-bit API on 64-bit Windows is slow ?
The 64-bit port employed fewer hippos. As it turns out, they were terrible coders. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple