On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:01:54PM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote: >On 06/14/2013 11:03 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>You pointed to an archived mail messages which implies that was fixed >>more than a year ago. What makes you think it is still a problem? > >The message I pointed to ><http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2012-05/msg00472.html> says this: > >>Testcase signal/kill: Signals may or may not reach the correct thread >>with 1.7.12-1 and newer. > >Confirmed. I think the reason is that we only have a single event to >signal that a POSIX signal arrived instead of a per-thread event, but >I'm not sure. This is cgf's domain so I leave it at that for now. > >I interpreted this to mean "the existence of the bug is confirmed, >here's why the bug occurs, and I'll let cgf deal with it". I didn't >see any followup message where cgf (is that you?) dealt with it. My >apologies if I misinterpreted the email.
Oops. I didn't read Corinna's message as thoroughly as I should have. Sorry. That particular issue was supposed to have been fixed in Cygwin 1.7.17, released in October 2012. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple