Well I uncovered a serious regression and expressed a willingness to track down the cause.
However your nasty reply and bad attitude assures that I will defintiely not help now. At 01:21 PM 7/31/2013 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >You are right in assuming that newer DLLs should >work with older binaries but no one is willing to >do tech support or debugging based on vague >problem reports. So, it isn't clear exactly what >you're expecting. If you think someone is going >to take a "1.7.16" installation and then drop a >newer cygwin1.dll into it to debug your problem >then you are likely going to be disappointed - >especially if you can't even be bothered to >subscribe to the mailing list. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
