Just a guess : http://linux.die.net/man/2/shmat
Maybe your code needs to optimize around memory abit. On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Olumide <50...@web.de> wrote: > > On 18/11/2014 00:45, Olumide wrote: >> >> According to the AMD CodeXL profiler, the modules cygwin1.dll and >> cygstdc++-6.dll account for 65.67% and 5.13% respectively of the runtime >> of my code. The breakdown is shown below: > > > Reposting breakdown (hopefully will be less mangled this time) > > Function Module Timer samples Timer samples > percent > shmat cygwin1.dll 36357 37.7186 > ZN4muto7releaseEP7_cygtls cygwin1.dll 19539 20.2708 > ZN4muto7acquireEm cygwin1.dll 16843 17.4738 > memmove cygwin1.dll 7906 8.2021 > operator new(unsigned int) cygstdc++-6.dll 6470 6.71231 > dlfree cygwin1.dll 3350 3.47546 > dlmalloc cygwin1.dll 2519 2.61334 > malloc cygwin1.dll 1159 1.20241 > free cygwin1.dll 799 0.828924 > _gcclibcxx_demangle_callback cygstdc++-6.dll 277 0.287374 > __wrap__ZdlPv cygwin1.dll 260 0.269738 > __wrap__Znwj cygwin1.dll 239 0.247951 > operator delete(void*) cygstdc++-6.dll 236 0.244839 > malloc cygwin1.dll 216 0.22409 > free cygwin1.dll 213 0.220977 > tmalloc_small(malloc_state*,..) cygwin1.dll 7 0.00726216 > > -- > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
