On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 11:09, Charles Wilson wrote:
> Sortof. I assumed <i>a priori</i> that a 557MB tarball is a bad idea. Yep. And the original poster, was asserting that such a tarball is a good idea. Thus my figures to show that it ain't - for the common case. > I was not, in any way, suggesting that setup learn how to parse a cygwin > "installation" created by some moron unzipping a bunch of tarballs by > hand. No way. Never. Whew :}. I didn't think *you* would suggest such a thing. I was more worried about having the last word, so that the archives will show it to be a bad thing :}. Rob -- --- GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt. ---
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
