On Jun 9 14:23, Helmut Karlowski wrote: > Achim Gratz > Tue, 9 Jun 2015 11:18:40 +0000 (UTC) > --------------------------------------------------- > > > Again, I just think procps is good enough for us as is, it is good enough > > for Linux anyway. > > :-) > > Would be great if the ps from procps would work as the current ps, > e.g. ps -W (with and without windows-processes - is this possible > now?), and no slowdown.
-W is not possible with procps, unless somebody implements it. We can't just copy over the code from Cygwin's ps for licensing reasons either. But, here's the deal: Nothing at all speaks against improving Cygwin's ps to put it on a better footing with procps. It's rather old code(*), but pretty simple and not much of it (less than 400 lines). It should be fairly easy to add functionality to make it a better ps. A clear case of https://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PGA Corinna (*) There are still Windows 2000 considerations in the code. Yuk! -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
pgp36wIrzdXxz.pgp
Description: PGP signature