-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 08/29/2015 02:25 PM, Andrey Repin wrote: > Greetings, Mike DePaulo! > >> Compare XChat to OpenOffice: https://lwn.net/Articles/654776/ >> XChat is an important part of open source history, but that is >> also what it is at this point in time. > > https://lwn.net/Articles/655022/ That's a more correct link. LO was > always a rip-off, and they dare claim they are "better". All this > bitching is actually counterproductive and harmful to the > community.
Sorry, I am not very knowledgeable on LO vs OO. I assumed that Christian Schaller's judgment was correct. But I am very knowledgeable about HexChat vs XChat. And I am confident that HexChat has a future, while XChat does not. - -Mike -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iF4EAREIAAYFAlXiBcYACgkQIFy22CVQsit6NAD/XgrhO/KaiDoy1NpfdlQh+seU hR6YD0C5Pr3O4TLL8p4A/1448ReRh81KcLgV5TCjk9V6dmwg7B5spND1Bt2uk1Ah =eyCf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
