Sorry I missed that - will try the new version today or tomorrow. On 27 January 2016 at 19:52, Achim Gratz <strom...@nexgo.de> wrote: > David Lee <mailtolky <at> gmail.com> writes: >> (1) A bug that the base-files script tries to link to files in >> C:\Windows\SysWow64\Drivers\Etc directory (should have been >> C:\Windows\System32\Drivers\Etc). > > That was a regression in cygpath, which has since been fixed. > >> (2) Your concern of whether there are 'other places to look >> for those files'. >> >> It seems that you want to wait for confirmations/denials for (2) before >> fixing (1). If there is none then (1) stays forever. I think it is better to >> separate two issues. >> >> First, fix (1) as if (2) doesn't exist (if you have problem >> with this then consider: the old code is coded as if (2) doesn't >> exist, why should the patched code be different?) >> >> Then, wait for confirmations for (2). You can always patch again if a >> confirmation emerges - it is never too late. If no answer comes up, >> at least the bug doesn't stay forever. > > There is no need to do anything in base-files for (1) since cygpath has been > fixed already and with no information to the contrary, no concern about (2). > > > Regards, > Achim. > > > > > -- > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple >
-- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple