On May 5, 2016, at 11:59 AM, Ken Brown <kbr...@cornell.edu> wrote: > > Ismail's suggestion did indeed produce deterministic builds in my setup. I > built a large project with about 150 executables, changed a few source files, > removed the build directory, rebuilt, and found that only the (expected) few > executables changed.
…and does it do the same on a very different system? e.g. Try it on both 64-bit Windows 10 and on 32-bit Windows 7. Perhaps you don’t need it, but part of the reason for the big push recently for reproducible builds is to be able to verify that binaries from a given source (e.g. Red Hat’s RPM feed) are in fact buildable from the sources distributed from the same source (e.g. Red Hat’s SRPMs). The usual motivation for that is security: it’s no good receiving an SRPM with a security patch if the binary that yum installs still has the bug. Therefore, if you get “reproducible” builds on only a single machine, you may not have achieved any useful result. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
