Are you referring to the 83.dotm file? Looks highly suspicious. o.O
A On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Jack Adrian Zappa <adrianh....@gmail.com> wrote: > Are you referring to the 83.dotm file? Looks highly suspicious. o.O > > > A > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Marco Atzeri <marco.atz...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> On 09/06/2016 17:08, Nellis, Kenneth wrote: >>> >>> Dear Cygwin, >>> A little supposition here, but it appears that the recent posting >>> from Viverra Inc. contained a malicious attachment, as detected by >>> my company's e-mail malware detection as it intercepted the recent >>> digest. I need now to appeal to them to allow me to continue >>> receiving e-mail from you. Cygwin has provided me invaluable tools >>> to do my software development work, so I hope this matter is >>> resolved promptly with my company. Meanwhile I ask that you review >>> your spam detection to minimize impact on me and others in my >>> situation. >>> --Ken Nellis >>> >> >> In general, I suggest you to not use the company's e-mail >> for mailing lists. >> >> The spam detection is never 100% accurate, something >> will always pass through and something will be falsely detected. >> >> My company's spammer filter sometimes report internal >> automatic mails as spam and don't catch real spam. >> >> Regards >> Marco >> >> >> >> -- >> Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html >> FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ >> Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html >> Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple >> > -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple