On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Gerald S. Williams wrote: > [snip] > If cgf wants an otter, we should be looking into how to get a good > drawing of one. Preferably a mean one, I guess. :-) I suppose we can > give it sunglasses at least. Or have it smashing through a window > carrying twin machine-guns. :-) :-)
Hmmm, I have a feeling I'm opening a whole new can of worms by returning to this old discussion, but I bought this really cool-looking stone figurine of an otter recently. I've found a site that sells them on the internet, just so people have an idea of what it looks like: http://www.funcollections.com/second/otters.html (for the record, I have the one called Oprah; it looks much cuter "in person" :-D). Now the question I have is simple: I know the otter itself is copyrighted artwork, but what about the photographs? Does the copyright belong to the artist, or to whomever took the photograph? In other words, if I snapped a picture of that otter, could we use it? Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! Oh, boy, virtual memory! Now I'm gonna make myself a really *big* RAMdisk! -- /usr/games/fortune -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/