> Gesendet: Dienstag, 12. Juni 2018 um 20:02 Uhr > Von: Lee <ler...@gmail.com> > On 6/12/18, Sven Eden wrote: > > Good style is to guarantee, that > > not more than one slash is issued. > > Why don't you submit a patch to guarantee that not more than one slash > is issued?
Already done. > Or submit a bug report that the earlier patch broke portability? Already done. > Asking cygwin to change their long standing, posix allowed, > implementation defined behavior seems like the least likely way to get > the problem fixed. I never did that. All I did was to ask whether such an extension would be possible. It is, so my question is answered. And btw., the implementation, if extended in the way I proposed, would still be POSIX compliant. ;-) Cheers Sven -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
