On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 5:03 AM Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> wrote: > whether someone patches the cygwin dll or cp, it seems like some rather > hairy code for what is normally a rare corner case, so it probably won't > happen unless someone actually contributes a patch.
Right. Here's a completely untested guess patch: --- a/winsup/cygwin/syscalls.cc +++ b/winsup/cygwin/syscalls.cc @@ -1363,7 +1363,15 @@ open (const char *unix_path, int flags, ...) opt |= PC_CTTY; } - if (!(fh = build_fh_name (unix_path, opt, stat_suffixes))) + suffix_info *suffices = stat_suffixes; + if ((opt & (O_WRONLY|O_BINARY)) == (O_WRONLY|O_BINARY)) + { + /* Hack so 'cp foo bar' doesn't abort with + 'cp: cannot create regular file bar: File exists' + if bar.exe already exists */ + suffices = NULL; + } + if (!(fh = build_fh_name (unix_path, opt, suffices))) __leave; /* errno already set */ if ((flags & O_NOFOLLOW) && fh->issymlink ()) { Feel free to throw rotten fruit :-) - Dan -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple