On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 11:52 AM Achim Gratz wrote: But more to the point: since you include GPL components, a binary-only > distribution is not OK. The sources for at least the GPL licensed > utilities and libraries is missing. It's not enough to say what these > are and roughly where to get them and leave the users with figuring it > out for themselves, you are supposed to provide sources in the same way > as your binaries, for the exact version you used to create the binaries, > including any modifications to the build system or the sources > themselves. >
I misunderstood, since the source is already freely available from cygwin and I am not changing any of the binaries. I can certainly include the source as a component in the installer for the next version. Bill -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
