On Aug 13 12:56, David Balažic via Cygwin wrote: > Before, during and after plugging in a n USB stick: > > $ cat /proc/partitions > major minor #blocks name win-mounts > > 8 0 1000204632 sda > 8 1 102400 sda1 > 8 2 16384 sda2 > 8 3 999571820 sda3 C:\ > 8 4 510976 sda4 > > $ cat /proc/partitions > major minor #blocks name win-mounts > > 8 0 1000204632 sda > 8 1 102400 sda1 > 8 2 16384 sda2 > 8 3 999571820 sda3 C:\ > 8 4 510976 sda4 > 8 16 62522712 sdb > 8 17 4096000 sdb1 D:\ > 8 18 58424664 sdb2 > 8 16 62522712 sdb > 8 17 4096000 sdb1 D:\ > 8 18 58424664 sdb2 E:\ > > $ cat /proc/partitions > major minor #blocks name win-mounts > > 8 0 1000204632 sda > 8 1 102400 sda1 > 8 2 16384 sda2 > 8 3 999571820 sda3 C:\ > 8 4 510976 sda4 > 8 16 62522712 sdb > 8 17 4096000 sdb1 D:\ > 8 18 58424664 sdb2 E:\ > > > So the second listing shows sdb twice. Also E: does not seem to exist > (see below).
So, second report. Which OS is that on? I don't have any physical Windows machine anymore, so I have a bit of a problem to reproduce this. As I wrote in https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/2021-August/249012.html, I don't see how Cygwin would be able to duplicate entries, unless the OS itself duplicates entries. Somebody who can duplicate this issue would have to single step through function format_proc_partitions, see https://sourceware.org/git/?p=newlib-cygwin.git;a=blob;f=winsup/cygwin/fhandler_proc.cc;h=66d19ab82f;hb=HEAD#l1686 and check what actually happens in the above cases. Corinna -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
