On Dec 12 15:22, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] via Cygwin wrote: > Sorry about the earlier typos > > > (and, hence, I suppose for the purposes of the OP). > > and, hence, I suppose, *would work* for the purposes of the OP. > > > Since realpath is supposed to resolve all symlinks, > > I meant by default (the -P behavior). If -s was asked, then the output would > be corect.
Options are only available in realpath(1). As for under the hood, realpath(3) has no options so it can only return one of the alternatives. Corinna -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
