On Apr 2 12:44, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote: > On Apr 2 01:42, Bruce Jerrick via Cygwin wrote: > > I just did binary-search regression tests on the available > > old test versions, and found this: > > > > OK: cygwin-3.6.0-0.86.gbfe2790e7bc4.tar.xz > > BAD: cygwin-3.6.0-0.92.g8bd6ba8f16ec.tar.xz > > Thanks, I found the offending patch, but I have to think about a > solution. > > Stay tuned, > Corinna
Just building cygwin-3.6.0-0.109.ga0a25849f9dd, should be up in an hour or two. Please give it a try. Thanks, Corinna -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple