<mailbox:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/BoydE/Application%20Data/Mozilla/Mail/earnie/Mail5/Mail/pop.mail.yahoo.com/Inbox.sbd/Cygwin.sbd/Cygwin%20Users?number=28386064&part=1.5&type=message/rfc822&filename=cygwin.75218>
Yes, but a program that was built to use Win32 would have a ';' in it's path, even if it is run under Cygwin.
Earnie.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- You know, I didn't set a Reply-To so that when you did a Reply-All I would get the mail personally so that I could just reply to the mail. -- If you're going to remove all distribution components when responding, you might as well make the list forwarder set the Reply-To to the list, not that I'm in favor of it. -- I would appreciate that the email distribution remain intact. --
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 21:42:15 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Path Seperator Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 09:31:39PM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote: >Simply check for the presence of ';' in PATH, if it exists that is the >seperator else ':' is the seperator. You'll never see a ';' separator if you use getenv in cygwin. And you won't reliably see a ':' separator if you use a windows function. -- Please use the resources at cygwin.com rather than sending personal email. Special for spam email harvesters: send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and be permanently blocked from mailing lists at sources.redhat.com
-- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/