On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 10:12:29AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > >Now, does anyone care to package it? ;-) > > Haven't I already vetoed this once? > cgf
Not that I recall. I believe you vetoed cgdb (as Ronald Landheer-Cieslak mentioned already). If you did, I apologize. If not, I'm assuming you're planning to. May I inquire why you propose to veto this package? FWICS, there are some clear advantages to using DDD over insight in some contexts (e.g., insight is a frontend for gdb only, whereas DDD handles other debuggers, as stated on the list recently; insight is a Win32 app, whereas DDD is an X app; possibly others). FWIW, I'd vote for it. In any case, this discussion is moot until someone volunteers to maintain it and posts a package proposal to cygwin-apps. Perhaps this needs to be continued on that list once this happens, unless you've already decided to veto the package no matter what. Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D. '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! "I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route to the bathroom is a major career booster." -- Patrick Naughton -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/