"Igor Pechtchanski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Alex Vinokur wrote: > > > "Corinna Vinschen" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 11:19:27AM +0200, Alex Vinokur wrote: > > > > How can one know if a function requested to be inlined is actually > > > > inlined? > > > > > > A look into the assembler output generated by gcc/g++ will show you. > > > > How can one conclude if a function is actually inlined on the basis > > working with the nm and objdump utilities? For instance, are 'the foo2() > > and foo3() function from my original posting' actually inlined? > > The general rule of thumb is: if there's a call to a function, it's not > inlined. > > > $ grep foo t.s > > > > .globl __ZN3Foo4foo1Ev > > .def __ZN3Foo4foo1Ev; .scl 2; .type 32; .endef > > __ZN3Foo4foo1Ev: > > call __ZN3Foo4foo1Ev > > call __ZN3Foo4foo2Ev > > call __ZN3Foo4foo3Ev > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > FWIW, it doesn't look like they are inlined.
On the other hand we don't see * call foo2() and * call foo3() here : $ objdump -CS t.o | grep foo 1a: e8 00 00 00 00 call 1f <main+0x19> 1f: e8 00 00 00 00 call 24 <main+0x1e> 2a: e8 d1 ff ff ff call 0 <Foo::foo1()> 35: e8 00 00 00 00 call 3a <main+0x34> 40: e8 00 00 00 00 call 45 <main+0x3f> ===================================== Alex Vinokur mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mathforum.org/library/view/10978.html ===================================== -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/