> -----Original Message----- > From: Brian Ford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 15 January 2004 17:50 > To: Dave Korn > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: CVS b0rked?
> Please don't include plain text email addresses in the body > of messages. > They are food for spam harvesters. I imagine this was just > an oversight as I think I have seen you remove them before? Oops, yes indeed. Sorry. It happened because I replied to the copy you sent me directly instead of to the copy which came via the listserv with the redacted headers. So I quoted an addy, but then again you've been Cc'ing posters as well as sending to the list. Chalk us up one minor breach of list etiquette each! > > > [snip] > > > > FAIL: pthread/cancel11.c (execute) > > > > > > > I don't see this one on NT4. > > > > > I repeated 'make check', and it repeated. > There should be no reason to rebuild under a different Cygwin > DLL version. Agreed, unless by some terrible coincidence there's a bug in the snapshot version that impacts on the compiler in some subtle way. However that's a pretty unlikely possibility I agree. > However, if you did not do a clean build as I suggested after > CGF fixed the CVS tree, I would again recommend it. Yeh, I just completely rm my obj and install dirs every time. > You could try to debug it :). Ya never know, I might just do that. Is it worth rebuilding with --enable-debugging at configure time ? I dunno how much worthwhile that will actually give me.... DaveK -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/