On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Hans Horn wrote: > this was something I did try out as well. However, the dll produced with > "-no-cygwin" was just as "bad" as before. > Then I recalled faintly reading some discussion a while back, that > "mingw-gcc != gcc -no-cygwin" (don't remember details, though).
-no-cygwin ? I thought it was -mno-cygwin. Or are both the same thing ? -- http://www.pervalidus.net/contact.html -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
