Hello, Corinna. On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 10:08:53AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > I'm not sure if it "must", but it's the solution which costs as few grief > as possible. I tried various combinations but in the end, writing all > output files in binary was the only one to stop patch to screw up files > in one way or the other. > > Since you can be sure that patch creates always LF files, I don't see > a problem in using unix2dos on them afterwards. It's reliable.
At first I didn't want it because I thought it would touch the unpatched files; this seems not to be the case, so I think I can live with it, although it takes some time to process the whole tree. Thanks for your time! With kind regards, Baurjan. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/