Dave wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Gerrit P. Haase >> Sent: 09 June 2004 10:11
>> > If it was discovered that java doesn't work under cygwin >> in 3.3.3, and >> > nobody was available to fix it, wouldn't that explain why >> someone has >> > disabled it in configury for 3.3.4, as we were discussing >> on the gcc list >> > earlier ? >> >> Sorry, I missed this thread. Have you a link handy? > Heh, it was you who started it (well kind of) > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-06/msg00479.html > and follow-ups. Yes, I saw that, it is neccessary to define --enable-libgcj for configure to get libjava. But it was not said that it 'doesn't work' to build libjava (or executables). I saw also that Tim Prince posted testresults for 3.4.0 with some failures for libjava (about 90 tests FAIL), I saw nearly 900 FAIL in the libjava testsuite and jv-convert and rm* binaries crash immediatly when they start for me. Meanwhile libjava doesn't build (i.e. jv-convert) at all, because of undefined references (3.4.0) or multiple definition of symbols (3.3.4). Gerrit -- =^..^= http://nyckelpiga.de/donate.html -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/