Max Bowsher schrieb:I took over as packager of SWIG for Cygwin a while ago, and am now getting ready to produce a new package.
SWIG seems to make incompatible changes with depressing frequency, so decisions on when to package a new version need to be made with much greater deliberation then other packages - to that end, I'd to get an idea of how much the current swig package is being used, and for what.
libming: for python and tcl not yet swig'ified (manual updates): java, php, perl, ruby.
Ok, I had a look at the source (though the tarball that I looked at seemed somewhat broken in the build system).
This swig binding seems to be just one module - rather than a set of interacting modules. It is the support for multiple interacting modules which is in turmoil, so I'm hoping ming will work fine with more recent swig.
Do you have a cygwin package of ming that I could test a proposed new cygwin swig package against?
Max.
-- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
