Morche Matthias schrieb:
Is the expected behaviour of clamscan to avoid scanning the root directory as shown 
below?

$ clamscan -v -r /

Certainly not. Thanks for the report! Clearly a clamscan bug. (Still < 1.0)

$ clamscan -v //
///.bash_history: Access denied.
Scanning ///.rnd
///.rnd: OK
Scanning ///curl-la.patch

So clamscan wrongly adds another / to the front.
(three is okay, two is a network path)
Will be fixed ASAP.

My latest huge autotool patch got no response from Thomas so far, so it could need some time to be fixed upstream also.

----------- SCAN SUMMARY -----------
Known viruses: 25864
Scanned directories: 1
Scanned files: 0
Infected files: 0
Data scanned: 0.00 MB
I/O buffer size: 131072 bytes
Time: 0.940 sec (0 m 0 s)



A "clamscan -r /*" does a scan through at least some subdirectories!

-- Reini Urban http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/



Reply via email to