Dave Korn wrote on Wednesday, November 17, 2004 6:24 PM: > I beg to differ. > > My post contained the useful information that dumping a > couple of hundred Kb of unsolicited strace output on the list > is a pointless waste of time. > > Yours contained a couple of hundred Kb of unsolicited strace output. > > http://www.google.com/search?q=unsolicited+strace+site:cygwin.com&hl=en&lr=&filter=0 > > *Mine* contained more useful info and was a fraction of the size.
Well, nonetheless, none of your comments really help with the problem. I know, that there were massive changes handling fork() and the pipes. So what shall I do, if a the problem now only manifests regularly if scp is called by Java calling a dos batch calling a shell script ? Using strace the problem is going to happen much more unlikely. So what do you mean is it good using a debugger? I really tried hard to find a combination, that makes the problem more obvious without such a weird setup and I cried here for any help, that would enable me to find a better scenario or that enables anyone else to find the problem. > I rest my case. So, if you can't or won't help, I prefer no answer. - Jörg -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/