> Charles Wilson wrote: > > > Yes and no, Corinna. Merely having them on the harddrive > in a company > > computer could be construed as "creating a hostile work environment" > > -- leading to liability issues for the company and > employment "issues" > > for the unsuspecting cygwin user. > > Any company firing me for "creating a hostile work > environment" for such a matter as this is, in my book, not a > company I wish to work for. YMMV. >
Nor I. In fact, I doubt many would disagree. But then, many have mouths to feed, and may not have the luxury of wishing. > > I'm definitely going to have to uninstall the fortune > package at work > > -- probably even if the xxx content is "encrypted". My employer is > > lenient enough when it comes to "rogue" cygwin > installations (e.g. not > > installed by the IT guys) but they'll get downright annoyed if > > employees create a liability problem for them by installing > something > > that might offend another employee (e.g "create a hostile work > > environment") > > What the hell is some other employee doing snooping around > your computer to view these files?!? To me *that's* a hostile > work environment created by the snooping employee! Welcome to the 21st century Andrew. -- Gary R. Van Sickle -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/