On Jan 15 08:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Seems to me we ought to see if we can't update the symlink() impl such that > this is addressed. I'm betting there's some new attributes or whatever (as > Igor notes) that've been added to symlinks in XP and if we can figure out > what > that is, and figure out what the minimum is we need to change in our > cygwin-created .lnk files, we can perhaps (likely?) fix this without > adversely > affecting performance. Maybe there's some new system call on XP that we can > use to create these buggers (if we're lucky)? After all, AFAIK, all cygwin > cares about is the cygwin path being in the .lnk file's "comment" > attribute/field, yes?
I'm glad that you're talking about "us" as a group. Anybody interested in tracking that down? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/