-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Is there any reason that a managed mount can't treat backslash like it does for non-printing characters, rather than treating it as an alternate spelling of a directory separator? True, there isn't much use in naming a file "foo\\bar", as distinct from the directory/file pair "foo/bar", but this is a remaining incompatibility with Unix file systems, where `touch foo\\bar' actually creates a file rather than complaining because directory foo doesn't exist.
Also, it appears that PATH_MAX, as defined in /usr/include/limits.h (at 259, barely larger than the 256 required by POSIX), applies to the underlying Windows name and not the length of the cygwin POSIX-style name. This is rather weird in managed mounts, where in a deep enough hierarchy, the filename abcd is valid but ABCD causes an ENAMETOOLONG. By the way, how come /usr/include/limits.h does not define NAME_MAX (required to be at least 14)? - -- Life is short - so eat dessert first! Eric Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Cygwin) Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCMhI084KuGfSFAYARArC0AJ0eICkuhRdnvQICNWic0hxv7/gyawCgyqUg D6WdGgIgdtN/KV2VlL4cepA= =T4W2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/