> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Korn
> Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 8:15 AM
> To: cygwin@cygwin.com
> Subject: RE: FDA-conform validation - any hints?
> 
> ----Original Message----
> >From: Gary R. Van Sickle
> >Sent: 12 April 2005 14:01
> 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jan Schormann
> 
> <...snip...> 
> 
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Jim Drash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> Sent: Montag, 11. April 2005 20:51
> >>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> Subject: Re: FDA-conform validation - any hints?
> >>> 
> 
> 
>   You must be having a 'senior moment' <g> 
> http://cygwin.com/acronyms#PCYMTNQREAIYR and all that, old bean!
> 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ISTHATTOTALLYRANDOM

(e.g., I took no action to de-spamify your email).

What ever happened to the grand plans to completely redo the world's email
infrastructure to prevent spam that we kept hearing about a year or so ago?

-- 
Gary R. Van Sickle


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Reply via email to