----Original Message---- >From: Jeff Johnston >Sent: 28 April 2005 19:33
> Hi Dave, > > Thanks for looking into this. Your patch wasn't quite correct. It > ended up breaking nan-support which isn't tested in the accompanying > testcase. It needed to verify that x & multiple_flags_ored_together == > multiple_flags_ored_together. Anyway, I have checked a patch in and > verified that it works for your tests below plus it also works for a > simple test like > i = sscanf ("nank", "%lf%c%n", &x, &m, &n) > > -- Jeff J. Heh, actually we probably have to talk about that. The k should IIUIC be swallowed by the %lf and the %c should fail; this is the production described as NAN(n-char-sequence opt) in the C language spec, strtod documentation (that's 7.20.1.3.3 in WG14/N843 draft, I don't have the final version). And we haven't even mentioned the lack of INF support yet :) However I'm on UK time, so it won't be happening today! cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/