On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
> To me it's just not natural to think of having ntsec without smbntsec. I
> forget what, if any, issues might have been involved. I can't think of a
> situation where you'd want Cygwin to honor ntsec but not honor
> smbntsec...
When the SMB server doesn't reflect the permissions correctly, or when the
owner user on the remote end isn't accessible via Windows (e.g., mounting
a DFS filesystem via SMB).
Igor
--
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
|\ _,,,---,,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow!
If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity
of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. /DA
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
