Dr. Volker Zell wrote: > > I think the OP means emacs and not xemacs. >
Yes, I mean EMACS and not XEmacs! I confirm that the problems described in http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2005-12/msg00441.html are absent with the snapshot 2005.10.24. Ciao, angelo. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
