Jeff Johnston wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Jeff,
On Feb 27 12:13, Jeff Johnston wrote:
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
yes, isnan and friends are supposed to be macros only, not functions.
I'll start working on a newlib patch for this.
while you're at it, please do *not* remove the isnan function
implementation. It's still required to run applications which
have been linked against older newlib versions. Just adding
a isnan macro should be sufficient, shouldn't it?
Yep, way ahead of you :). I will rename the current implementations to
be double-underscored, have the macros call these, and have
non-underscored versions that directly call the underscored versions. I
think that should satisfy all concerns.
-- Jeff J.
I have just checked in a solution. Builds fine for x86-linux and I
verified both the new macro versions work and the old function names can
be called. Let me know if anything breaks that I didn't anticipate.
-- Jeff J.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
