> Perhaps implicit in Brian's response, there is little incentive for > anyone to do this, since generation of .pdb by open source compilers > will not be permitted. The obstacles to full functioning of .pdb with > commercial 3rd party compilers are high enough.
Certanly! .pdb doesn't documented very well :-). Moreover, microsoft changes its internal structures from version to version. But, my point is to use gdb as alternative to microsoft windbg. In my case I prefer GDB because of its open standards. Also I suppose GDB has enough functionality to write something like extenstions, macroses to enhance the specific analysis. Sergey. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/