On Jan 5 12:42, Brian Ford wrote: > On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > So, it does indeed look taken.
Too bad. > > Actually this shows a problem in the mmap implementation with respect to > > MEM_TOP_DOWN. I think, what mmap should actually do is to create a > > lightweight MAP_RESERVE anonymous mapping of the whole requested mapping > > size, then close it again and then reopen it with the address it got > > in this first try. This would probably ensure that the subsequent two > > mapping will work. > > I don't know what mmap magic Cygwin uses internally to do this, but can't > you just map the big region, then overmap the disk file without the map, > unmap, remap, remap? "overmap"? -v please? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/