Jan Djärv wrote:
Larry Hall wrote:
 > Jan D. wrote:
> It seems that when Emacs defines its own malloc and friends, memalign
> returns ENOSYS. But emacs defines its own memalign as well. Shouldn't that
> one be called?


Seems like it though it sounds like something that would be controlled by
the emacs configure script to me.


I don't follow. How can the Emacs configure script make sure the Emacs supplied memalign is called by glib?


Ah, sorry.  I missed that you were referring to glib.  I agree that there
should be some consistency here.  Perhaps things would work better if Emacs
used none of it's own m* implementations.  That's just a WAG.  I really
have no experience with the Emacs code base.  But it does sound to me like
this would be Emacs configurable at least. ;-)


--
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd.                          (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
> Q: Are you sure?
>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Reply via email to