On 05/14/2007, Markus E.L. wrote: > "DaveKorn" writes: > > > > On 14 May 2007 21:27, Markus E.L. wrote: > > > > >> >> often. Did you mean setup.ini instead? But setup.ini is coming from > >> >> the mirror, isn't it? > > > > > > Well, it comes from the mirror, same as the packages do, but it isn't > > > generated there, if that's what you mean. > > No, that wasn't what I meant. I thought, just for a moment, wether > setup.exe wouldn't take the setup.ini from the master site every time > to ensure that it is current. Of course then the mirror site wouldn't > necessarily be up date, so that was not really good idea. Just > triggered by Larry's idea about the propagation delay, which, then, I > really don't get.
My comment about propagation delay was in regards to "setup.exe", not "setup.ini" or the packages. -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/