On 5/23/07, Matthew Woehlke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lev Bishop wrote:
> Also, why do you have it so that -s is not just a synonym for -d, and
> why doesn't -l force -w? There seems to be no advantage to forcing the
> user to specify an additional flag.
...as I previously noted, '-us' is a reasonable combination of flags,
thus '-ul' is also reasonable. I did suggest that '-l' should /imply/
'-w' unless '-u' is used.
Well, currently it treats -us or -ul or plain -l or plain -s all as
errors and gives the usage message.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
