Well, then I guess it is the first time I did post some xemacs specific bug. I fully agree that free software is effort of everyone.
/wbr Ariel Burbaickij On 7/9/07, Vin Shelton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ariel Burbaickij wrote: > Experiences made are alas bad -- xemacs in version 21.4.20 has some of > the functions empty, those supposedly present behave very strange, > experimental version 22.1 just fails to start as it > misses several directories. > I can't see any record of your ever having posted to the xemacs-beta mailing list reporting any problem, nor have you posted any xemacs-specific bug reports to the cygwin mailing list, AFAICT. With your help, free software can get better, but the XEmacs team can only address the problems we know about. Please report the problems you observed. Regards, Vin Shelton acs at xemacs dot org -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
-- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
