Angelo Graziosi wrote: > In any case, it seems that 'tgamma' has some problem, as this bug report > says (your results are the same): > > http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5159
That is a bug report against glibc. You cannot draw any inferences between that and newlib/Cygwin because they are totally separate and unrelated code bases. Marco Atzeri wrote: > Not confirmed on latest snapshot That would be expected given Lev's indication of a fix in newlib: <http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2007-10/msg00252.html>. Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/