On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Reini Urban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Mirko > > 2008/2/17, Mirko Vukovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I am trying to build a dll for gsl. I want to link it to clisp. > > I would suggest not to use a static clisp module, just use the FFI. > This is much simplier, smaller and easier to test. See libsvm or matlab, > or pari for a more optimized binding. > > I want to do this for my gdi module also, but had no time yet. > And we still have no header parser, which could construct the > FFI binding automatically. cffi might be useful. > -- > Reini Urban > http://phpwiki.org/ http://murbreak.at/ > http://spacemovie.mur.at/ http://helsinki.at/ > > > > -- > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > > Reini,
The reason why I need cffi is that I am trying to get nlisp to work on clisp+cygwin. And nlisp is using cffi. I have nlisp running at work on linux+sbcl, but my laptop has only cygwin. I posted a message on the cffi mailing list, and Luis is helping me there. Mirko -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
