On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Reini Urban wrote: > Hugh Sasse schrieb: > > On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, Christopher Faylor wrote: [...] > > set? Were I in this position, I'd rather not have to trawl the mail > > archives. That's the only mechanism suggested at > > <http://cygwin.com/contrib.html>. [...] > > Would you accept patches to the contrib page that suggested the use > > of the existing bugzilla as a resource? If so, then I'd like to add a table > > of contents and re-order things a bit as well. > > > > > is going to change that or convince a small team of busy developers to > > > do your bidding. > > We already have the setup bugzilla in operation. > I am responsible for incoming tickets, most of them are spam, and trigger the > developers if there's some update. > > It's additional work and in most of the cases not needed, but in some cases it > might be useful.
So would you prefer that I NOT suggest a patch to <http://cygwin.com/contrib.html>. to draw people's attention to the existing Bugzilla? Else, if you'd like a patch, to whom should I send it? > > The current -p patch is at > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6688 > > The name selection filter suggestion not yet. > > And it would be good if the setup.exe suggestion/reports would be posted to > the right list, which is cygwin-apps, not cygwin! I could try and work something in to a patch for contrib.html about that, if it is desired. > I rather tend to ignore it here. Understandably. Thank you Hugh -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/