On 17 Oct 00, Jonathan Kamens writes:
> We are compiling things, but we aren't linking them against
> cygwin1.dll. Our product is not linked against any Cygwin DLLs, so I
> don't think this is the problem. Certainly, we've been able to drop
> in new cygwin1.dll versions in the past without any trouble. Are you
> saying that things are different in the cygwin1.dll's released since
> 1.1.4, and that if we are doing any compiling at all, even of things
> that are not linked against cygwin libraries, we have to replace all
> of cygwin?
I had assumed you were building Cygwin applications. Unfortunately,
you did not provide this extra information in your first message.
Someone else will have to help you then.
Regards,
David
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
