> > The only comment is that all directories with wrong time are mount > points, and > they point to the FAT drives (root directory of FAT drives to be precise). I > cannot reproduce it with the same snapshot under Win2k with NTFS. If I mount > d: on /dosd I get correct time. That agrees with your output where > NTFS drives > do not have this problem. > > So, it smells like Cygwin bug. > OTOH does root of FAT drive have any associated time at all? Probably, not. -andrej -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Why does ls report some directory dates as ... Don Sharp
- Re: Why does ls report some directory ... Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
- RE: Why does ls report some directory ... John Wiersba
- Re: Why does ls report some direct... Don Sharp
- Re: Why does ls report some di... Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
- Re: Why does ls report som... Don Sharp
- Re: Why does ls report some di... Don Sharp
- RE: Why does ls report som... Andrej Borsenkow
- Re: Why does ls repor... Don Sharp
- RE: Why does ls r... Andrej Borsenkow
- Re: Why does ... Andrej Borsenkow
- Re: Why does ls report som... Christopher Faylor
- RE: Why does ls report some direct... Dan Haynes
- Re: Why does ls report some directory ... Earnie Boyd
- Re: Why does ls report some directory ... Earnie Boyd
- RE: Why does ls report some directory ... Earnie Boyd
- Re: Why does ls report some directory ... DJ Delorie
